A
Schizephrenic Southern Splinter State
The
Confederate Flag Flies At Full Staff
The
View From The U.S. Virgin Islands
By
JOHN McCARTHY
Virgin
Islands Free Press
There’s
no denying it.
South
Carolina has a violent and racist past, with some tolerance mixed in.
The
mere name “South Carolina” – suggests that it broke away from a larger Carolina
– and that would be true.
The
name Carolina is Latin for “Charles land” and goes back to 1629 when Britain’s
King Charles I gave all of the southern colonies to Britain’s Attorney General
Robert Heath. In 1663, Charles’ son King Charles II gave eight wealthy English
aristocrats (mostly migrating from their sugar cane plantations in Barbados) a
royal charter to settle Carolina because they had helped him regain his throne.
The
Carolina coast was originally founded by the Spanish, but they were forced to
leave due to violence from Native Americans and a lack of provisions. From the
beginning of colonization, blacks outnumbered whites in South Carolina and that
would remain so up until the turn of the 20th century.
Carolina
originally split in 1719, when southern settlers seized control from its
proprietors. In 1729, Carolina became two royal colonies, North and South Carolina.
Farmers
from inland Virginia grew tobacco in North Carolina, while the fertility of the
low country and its natural harbors, such as in Charles Town, later Charleston,
allowed South Carolina to prosper.
Slaves
were imported from the rice-growing regions of Africa, who created the dams and
canals used to irrigate rice and indigo as commodity crops. South Carolina
tolerated religious freedom and allowed French Huguenot and Sephardic Jewish
communities from London to be merchants in the growing economy.
The
Stono Rebellion of 1739, resulted in the colony no longer allowing African
slaves to be imported through Charleston for ten years, as they believed the
less-seasoned slaves to be more likely to seed rebellions than the Caribbean
slaves who had grown up on plantations.
Although
its name comes from an English king, South Carolina became the first republic
in America when it adopted its own constitution on March 26, 1776. It was also
the first state to adopt the Articles of Confederation, the initial governing
document of the United States.
In
1822, following discovery of a conspiracy for a slave rebellion led by freed
slave Denmark Vesey, the state passed the Negro Seaman Act, which prohibited
foreign and northern black sailors from interacting with people in South
Carolina ports. As the act violated international treaties, it was declared
unconstitutional by Supreme Court Justice William Johnson. But Johnson’s ruling
was not enforced.
South
Carolina responded by passing the Ordinance of Nullification in 1832, declaring
unconstitutional and null the federal tariff laws of 1828 and 1832, and
prescribing that those laws would not be enforced in the state after February
1, 1833.
The
seventh U.S. President Andrew Jackson, a native of the Waxhaws border region
between the Carolinas, ended the crisis through the Force Bill that allowed the
federal government to use military force to enforce federal law in South
Carolina. It is considered the first law of the land ever to deny individual
states the right to secede.
Which
brings us to last night and 21-year-old Dylann Storm Roof of nearby Lexington,
South Carolina who is accused of killing nine people in the Emanuel African
Methodist Episcopal Church in Charleston – a church Vesey helped found and
which was burned to the ground by white supremacists in 1822 – the same year he
and 34 other black men were hanged after being found guilty of the alleged
slave revolt plot in a secret trial.
Asked
today by Democracy Now! co-host Nermeen Shaikh on PBS if there has been any
precedent “for this kind of violence” in South Carolina, Dr. Lonnie Randolph,
Jr. said: “yes.”
“Unfortunately
the answer is yes,” Randolph said. “And we don’t have a history of being a
leader in this country on human rights. And unfortunately it brings us to
reality … a reminder of the way South Carolina got to be South Carolina, the
things that South Carolina has done throughout history.”
Randolph
then referenced when Rep. Preston Brooks (D-SC) entered the U.S. Senate chamber
in 1856 and used his gold-tipped cane to beat Sen. Charles Sumner (R-MA) nearly
to death for his abolitionist views. Following the beating, in which Sumner
lived after sustaining a brain injury, Brooks was forced to resign his seat,
but returned home to South Carolina for a hero’s welcome.
Everyone
knows that the Civil War (officially called by the federal government “The War
Between The States”) began when Confederate batteries began shelling Fort
Sumter in Charleston Harbor on April 12, 1861, but how many remember 620,000
Americans died for that South Carolina-driven, eight-year experiment in
political limbo?
You
would have to be a student in Civil War-era flags to know that the current
South Carolina flag is an updated blue and white version of the rebel red
Sovereignty-Secession flag from the Confederacy of States of America.
Now
that Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) has announced his intentions to be the second
POTUS from South Carolina and the first bachelor in the White House since James
Buchanan in 1857, how would he explain in a debate why South Carolina still
allows the “Stars and Bars” to fly in front of its statehouse?
As
a follow-up, someone might ask Graham why the United States flag and the South
Carolina flag atop the statehouse flies at half mast today, but the Confederate
flag in front of the building on a Civil War monument flies at full mast?
The
symbolism is important, unless you forget your history.
John McCarthy is the Publisher of the Virgin Islands Free Press at: http://vifreepress.com
No comments:
Post a Comment